Saturday, June 14, 2008

What is it with women and poker?

Many people especially men get amazed with me when they found out that I play poker. I mean what is it with women and poker? I know that it is hot but I just kind of get annoyed when men get a little bit sexist when it comes to the game of poker. Women have the right to play poker as men do. So no need to get amazed. It does not mean that since poker is dominated by men, poker is already a men’s game. poker is neither a men’s game nor a women’s game. It should be a game for everyone; well, except of course for the young.

Men are having a hard time whenever a female beat them. Just because we are female do not mean that we are weak. In fact, if anything, we are smarter and wiser because you fall victim to our charm. Serves you right because you are always underestimating us. I remember playing poker last night with a couple of friends and some people I barely know. Most of them are guys, and only two of us are girls. Guess what happened? In the end, only that girl and I were left battling. Who won? Of course I won. I always win. Just so you know. Laugh out loud! It really amazes me when guys easily think that you are so into them. Just look at them flirtingly, show some skin, and they will get easily distracted.

Actually, if you ask me, since men keep on attacking the weakness of our gender, the real weak gender is men. Because men, cannot simply function properly without a woman behind them. Whether you like it or not, we control you. We are your inspiration, and you cannot get the pleasure you get every night without us. Us women, on the other hand, can function without men. We can live without sex, and we can certainly build our own house with your help. We are in the modern age now you know. Machines can easily replace men if they think they are so strong that women will always need them.

I know I sound mean. For your information, your gender is the mean one. Women will not act this way if you had not been underestimating us for how many centuries already. Just because you are physically stronger , does not mean that you are the leader, the president, the history, or the God. It does not work that way. Actually, there should not be any gender issue if only you treat us an equal. As something that compliments your very existence. Which is I think is the truth.

I never said that my gender is the supreme gender. I believe in a complimentary world, where every men compliments women, where night compliments day time, where black compliments white. A world like this one is a better world to live.

Not a world wherein you get amazed just because we beat you in poker.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Countries that want online poker to be legalized.....read to see the irony

I just recently read in this Poker blog that France is already catching up to the beat of online gambling. I did not know that they haven't started. I thought France was supposed to be an advanced country? I do not know. The article said something about European Infringement something which means that France i think has to consider some strict provisions in opening their doors to online gambling.

It seems that many are getting really hooked huh and it seems that some countries are already realizing the benefits of online Poker to their economies. Ironic though because while some are really opening their doors for Poker and legalizing it. United States of America are exhausting all its efforts to ban online Poker. Do they what they are doing? Sad to say, but i think other countries know better. Hello? If politicians are not sick, then why will they put a ban to something the state or the economy can profit from? Unless it has something to do with politicizing the very nature of the Poker industry...hmmm sounds highly suspicious.

I am sure the bill to legalize online Poker in France will have many supporters who are open minded. I know that like most things Poker has its implications but at the same time it also has benefits that many can reap from. What the United States government should do is to make sure that there will be strict implementation of these online Poker sites. No need to put a ban on it. The Poker industry and the government should work out something out like the one that recently happened in Canada.

The government of canada worked together with the Poker industry to settle something that turned out to be a charitable benefit. I am not sure if you are familiar with that Poker news. I am actually fond of reading Poker news that is why i know a lot when it comes to what is happening inside the Poker world. Anyway, going back, i think aside from France, Italy is also starting to make its way in legalizing online Poker and sports betting. I am just not sure though, i came across some site that are already starting to make their promotions.

If France and Italy are already making its way to legalize online
Poker, the government of united states are trying to put a ban it. Why? I want to hear first hand the reasons of politicians opposing online Poker. Maybe i can learn something from them. Laugh out loud!

Seriously, i am kind of thrilled that online Poker is booming. That will only mean huge earnings right? I hope though that there will be more Poker Rooms that are not so discriminating. I am hoping to find an online Poker Room where regardless of which country or continent you came from, you are always welcome to play. I wonder when this will happen. In Asia, online Poker is not that yet popular. I am sure it will be once the Poker industry realizes the market size of Asia, the largest continent.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

I need Patrik Antonius to kiss me


I seriously have a crush on Patrik Antonius! He is so hot and best of all, he loves playing Poker In case you do not know, Patrik- spelled without a C- is considered to be one of the greatest Poker players in the world. In fact, he easily got a replacement team after his contract in this European Poker team expired.

Team Full Tilt right away offered their welcoming hands to this hot boy because they know that their company will benefit by having Patrik play for them. I got to know Patrik when i was writing an article about him. He made the headlines last week since he is the latest addition to the Full Tilt team. I decided to check who he was, and then i got hooked. He is good looking and so talented as well! Aside from being a pro Poker player, he is also a tennis player. Imagine that? I bet he is a model too! With those eyes, height, and bone structure, modeling agencies will be dumb not to get him! I read from his website that since he could not play tennis anymore because of his serious back problems- awwww- he decided that he would just focus on playing Poker. After all, his passion, he says, in playing tennis and in playing Poker are just equal.

While my Poker training seems to be by books and by mentors, his was just plainly with friends. I wonder who would win if time would come that we would battle. Hmmm do not underestimate my Poker skills, i know i can be as good as anyone provided that i am just in the right mood, if you know what i am talking about. I hope that day comes, laugh out loud! Even if it comes, i think i will just lose since i know i will be conscious around him. Hahahaha.

I wonder if he has a girl friend or whatever, his lover or ex lovers are really lucky. Too bad, his website is just all about Poker and not really his personal life.- Duh, who would blog or write about their personal live? Patrik is not Paris Hilton or Lohan you know. Laugh out loud!

I hope he gets to read this by chance. Hahahaha. Oh well, i am just really trying to get over someone. Good thing, he does not know about this blog, or else i will be embarassed and he might get jealous over Patrik because Patrik is way better than him! -not really. Awww.

Oh mi god! I just saw in his myspace page this one: Una relacion which means he is in a relationship. Too bad. Haha. As if. Yes, i can speak a little bit of spanish as well. Como estas?

Anyway, I do not like the fact this website is so advertorial, i mean all he talks about there is Poker, can't he talk about something else like his experiences in other things. Oh my, this just in. Turns out that Patrik is already a father! Okay, that screwed everything. I gotta end this post.

Get A Move On

I am feeling the urge to jump down our balcony since i haven't been winning in any of my Poker games which is really frustrating me. I do not know if it is about me or is it just about my recent break up with my boyfriend that i could not focus. I am not used to being like this. I used to be the Poker shark you know.

I was at my friend's house last night and we played Texas Holdem with a couple of other people in the neighborhood. I really do not like it when there are other people i do not know in the table. I guess i was traumatized with the things that had happened to me before. I got cheated- just in case you did not read my preview posts. I consider cheating to be foul. Good thing, i got my money back or else there would be a huge fight since i am the type of person who really fight for my right.

Anyway there was not any cheating or stuff like that last night. It was a clean good Poker game. But why do i feel so glum and so unlucky the past few days? Is it because i allow my personal life to mess my game or to get into my game? I do not know if other people can sense it, maybe those Poker bastards and bitches sensed that i am vulnerable so they kept calling me.

If i am happy my Poker games are good as hell. But if i am depressed, gloomy, sad, or whatever adjectives you want to call it my Poker game is as bad as hell. Obviously, my moods, personal shitdoms are indirectly running my game. My moods determine the outcome of the play.

I hate it that my eyes are so transparent. I hate it that i cannot show a Poker face when i am gloomy or angered. Playing Poker is about suppressing your emotions, and deceiving those who are weak. Why do i feel like i am the weakest link now? This is not fair. Maybe i need to get back with him. He used to make me happy. He used to be the reason why i want to win in each of my game. Now that my reason is gone. I have no drive or motivation to win anymore. I am gone.

I know this should not be the case though. Many people are relying on me. My siblings get their tuition from me. What will happen to us if i stop playing Poker? We will die. We will all die. -Just kiddng.

Playing Poker is my way to live. I cannot give up on it or even think about giving up on it. I have to consider the future, and the present. Not the past. The past is history. Shit happens and there is no other way for me but to move ahead with my life and forget. Like everything else, it is hard. But i have to do it.

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Poker Nation and Moneymaker

Paris Hilton and Pam Anderson play it and Cinderella-story stars like Chris Moneymaker make millions at it. Small wonder Online Poker is so explosively popular.

In case you haven't noticed the card-by-card coverage of Texas Hold'em tournaments on TSN and ESPN -- and for that matter every other sports network -- Poker is in the midst of a major renaissance. Television ads, billboards and Web-based click-through banner ads blare the praises of Online Poker.

The companies that run the real-money games tease new players into free sites, where you can play and learn Holdem and other forms of Online Poker without risking a dime. But as you learn the game and build a stake of chips playing against beginners, you are faced with the lure of trying your luck against real players for real money. Free dot-net sites all have easy links to dot-com versions.

Poker Tournament in Las Vegas are major sporting events, festooned with ads for online poker sites and featuring athletes who look like they could barely climb a flight of stairs.

Blame Chris Moneymaker. A nobody from Tennessee, Moneymaker put up $40 and built it into $10,000 in qualifying tournaments held in online poker rooms. What he qualified for was the 2003 World Series of
Poker the first live Poker Tournament he had ever played in. He won.

Moneymaker was no rookie player. He honed his Poker skills playing at the PokerStars.com website, winning a few online tournaments as he gained experience.

It is that image that PokerStars -- and all of the hundreds of Poker websites that have sprung into existence since 2003 -- have leveraged into a truly massive enterprise.

How big is hard to know and the business landscape is complex. A handful of the big Online Poker companies are publicly traded, so their revenues are easy to get. The vast majority of the business, though, is privately owned and offshore, nestled on Caribbean atolls and tiny island banking havens away from the reach of the U.S. authorities.

Annoyed that Americans were gambling away about $6 billion a year online, the U.S. Congress tried to stop the bleeding by passing the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act in 2006. The act made it illegal for credit card companies to transfer funds to further online gambling and effectively criminalizing the act of receiving a bet.

While the law remains virtually untested, its impact was felt around the world.

Stock in Gibraltar-based PartyGaming Plc, which ran the world's biggest online poker system, fell from a total market value of $9 billion to about $1 billion almost overnight. PokerStars and a host of other privately owned Online Poker companies moved in to soak up the business that PartyGaming walked away from. A website fronted by long-time professional Online Poker player Doyle Brunson brought in Pamela Anderson and Nicky and Paris Hilton for their star power. Many other sites bring in top-ranked pros for people to play against and continue to brazenly do business in the U.S.

My favorite Poker Quotes



Almost everyone has their favorite quotes from exceptional movies. But putting movies aside and moving on with Poker, do you have any favorite quotations from established Poker players? Do not use google and search Poker quotations just so you can say you have a favorite. It will be pointless. Poker quotations can be found when you observe a lot every game or interviews of the greatest Poker players. Poker Reviews can only do so much in writing articles about Online Poker or Poker Rooms. What really matters is the things these greatest players say or do when they are in Poker Tournaments.

Just take a look at these quotes i have collected from several Poker enthusiasts and Poker's greatest players.

Poker is generally reckoned to be America’s second most popular after-dark activity. Sex is good, they say, but Poker lasts longer.”
- Alfred Alvarez

“I never go looking for a sucker. I look for a Champion and make a sucker off of him.”
- Amarillo Slim

Poker is a game of people… It’s not the hand I hold, it’s the people that I play with.”
- Amarillo Slim

“In the absence of any mathematical explanation, one thing is for certain; if you engage in games of chance long enough, the experience is bound to affect the way you see God. Successfully draw to an inside straight three hands in a row, and you’ve got to be blessed. But if you’re the person drawn out on, the one whose trip aces just got snapped for the third time, you will go home feeling cursed.”
- Andy Bellin

“If you know Poker, you know people; and if you know people, you got the whole dang world lined up in your sights.”
- Brett Maverick

Poker reveals to the frank observer something else of importance”it will teach him about his own nature. Many bad players do not improve because the cannot bear self-knowledge.”
- David Mamet

“It’s hard work. Gambling. Playing Poker. Don’t let anyone tell you different. Think about what it’s like sitting at a Poker table with people whose only goal is to cut your throat, take your money, and leave you out back talking to yourself about what went wrong inside. That probably sounds harsh. But that’s the way it is at the Poker table. If you don’t believe me, then you’re the lamb that’s going off to the slaughter.”
- Stu Unger

“The strong point in Poker is never to lose your temper, either with those you are playing with or, more particularly, with the cards. There is no sympathy in Poker. Always keep cool. If you lose your head you will lose all your chips.”
- William J. Florence

“There are few things that are so unpardonably neglected in our country as Poker. The upper class knows very little about Poker. Now and then you find ambassadors who have sort of a general knowledge of Poker, but the ignorance of the people is fearful. Why, I have known clergymen, good men, kind-hearted, liberal, sincere, and all that, who did not know the meaning of a flush. It is enough to make one ashamed of the species.”
- Mark Twain

And last, but not the least:

“There is more to Poker than life.”
- Tom McEvoy

Though i really like the last quote, i do not agree with it. So there. I think Poker just comes second to life.

Casinos are helping out addicts? Huh? How?



That last word is not usually mentioned in gambling circles, to be honest. It is one of those tags that society in general uses to label some people and to be frank, sometimes it is overused, giving card games such as Poker a bad name. Yet the reality remains. There are people who get hooked too much and cannot control themselves, leading to the erosion of his relationships and life in general. I think it is important that a person realizes the serious effect of live or Online Poker. Though there are little Poker Reviews written about gambling addiction- Poker Reviews normally tackles Poker Rooms, Poker news, and Poker personalities- a person should still have self discipline and make sure that they do not allow themselves to get that hooked on Poker that it would ruin their lives.


Not all is lost, though. In fact, at the Viejas Indian Reservation, there is good news for all involved. A group of addiction counselors were trained on the dangers of compulsive gambling. This was part of a movement that casino operators are starting - to help those who are addicted to gambling. Interesting, no?

According to Mark Sauer of SignonSanDiego:

“We don’t deny there is a problem,” said Bobby Barrett, incoming tribal chairman of Viejas, chairman of the California Tribal Business Alliance and a certified gambling counselor.

“We are concerned with the health and safety of the people in our casinos, and with the risk to people within our own tribal communities.”

Self-help, 12-step programs have mushroomed. There were 10 Gamblers Anonymous meetings a week in San Diego County five years ago; today there are 35.

The number of certified counselors who offer the therapy they say is needed to straighten out a pathological gambler is shockingly low.

“I’m the only one I know of actually doing treatment in the county,” said therapist Suzanne Graupner Pike, who has treated troubled gamblers in Vista since 2003. “There’s no money in it.”

The reason for that, Pike said, is the “impulse-control disorder associated with problem gambling is not considered a disease, like alcohol or drug abuse, and hardly any insurance companies cover it.”

And the patients, Pike added wryly, have no money left.

Most gamblers with serious or severe problems, who make up about 4 percent of California adults, according to the state study, have related psychological problems, such as depression, which are covered by insurance, Pike said.

“Society needs to realize we have a medical crisis (with problem gambling), and there should be federal, state and local funds available for education and treatment, just as with other addictions,” she said.

Barrett said the state’s fledgling Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling has a $3 million annual budget. He said that is not nearly enough, noting, “All of that funding comes from California gaming tribes.”

Lefkowitz said there are two basic types of problem gamblers: those who thrive on action, who tend to be men; and those who gamble to escape, generally women.

Now I am not saying I am biased, but it never occurred to me that women would be a great part of this gambling addiction problem! I guess it is a good thing, what they are doing in California. It is just wishful thinking on my part, I guess, that this sort of thing should never have happened in the beginning. Of course, there are some things we cannot control. Still, activities like this one brings hope to those who need it.

Are you going to vote for Obama?

I have been seeing a lot of posts lately discussing whether or not the Poker industry should vote for Obama. Based on the articles i have read, Obama used to be a Poker enthusiasts but eventually gave up on playing Poker when he became a politician. Here is what a Poker Review or rather an article says about him. Let me quote it for your convenience.

Toby Harnden writes:

"When he was a young state politician in Illinois, Barack Obama played his cards right. "He had the stone face," said Senator Terry Links, who hosted weekly Poker games at his home. 'He didn't stay in hands if he didn't think he had a chance of winning.'

Links told Harnden:

"Barack wasn't one of those foolish gamblers who just thought all of a sudden that card in the middle was going to show up mysteriously. He's as competitive in politics as he is in Poker. It's not like he's going to go into something without a course of action mapped out."


I have also read that Doyle Brunson will actually vote for him for a lack of better option. But does Poker really have a good future with Obama as president? Hmmmm. According to Newyorker, Many Presidents have been known to use Poker lingo when they talk policy. Lincoln used a Poker analogy to explain his decision not to apologize to Queen Victoria during the Trent Affair. Teddy Roosevelt’s Square Deal sprang from a Poker sensibility. “When I say I believe in a square deal, I do not mean . . . to give every man the best hand,” Roosevelt explained. “If the cards do not come to any man, or if they do come, and he has not got the power to play them, that is his affair. All I mean is that there shall not be any crookedness in the dealing.”

Even though politicians used the Poker lingo, it does not mean that they will support Poker industry all the way, no not all the way. It does not mean that they will support the Poker industry at all because Poker, may it be the table Poker or Online Poker is still all about gambling. Another article from Newyorker states that Obama just played Poker for the sake of building alliances for his candidacies.

"Before his recent loss in the Nevada caucus, Barack Obama took heat (from the Clinton camp and from casino executives) for his history of opposing the expansion of legal gambling. His campaign people never pointed out, in his defense, that their man considers himself to be “a pretty good Poker player.” (That’s what he told an Associated Press reporter who asked him to name a hidden talent.) This puts him in the company of Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, Warren Harding, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, and Richard Nixon. And, like Teddy Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson, Senator Obama seems to have played the game at least partly because it enabled him to form political alliances that he might not otherwise have formed."

Let's face it, being a politician- or a president of any country- means having control over certain political dynamics. I do not think that a president will risk his position and support the gambling industry. Though i very much like that they support the Poker industry, i do not think it will happen. I hope i am wrong though. Let Obama prove otherwise.

Saturday, June 7, 2008

You're not that rich, Practice inexpensive advertising

Sadly we have come to the end of the golden rule saga. This is already the final installment, so listen and read carefully and stop going to other adult sites which will not improve your Poker skills!

Before i go ahead and discuss the seventh golden rule, i just want to say that i hope you have learned something really useful in this Poker Blog. Though most of the rules do not apply to Online Poker and online poker rooms, i still hope that my chosen golden rules which serve somewhat as a helpful Poker Review will guide you a lot in upcoming Poker Tournaments.

In this final installment of golden rules, we look at the almost-unheard-of-at-the-home-game weapon known as advertising. If you are not familiar with the term or have never given thought to employing it at a home game, hopefully you will recognize its value by the end of this.

lot of home games work with the same principle: friends, new and old, getting together on a regular basis to play cards. While home Poker is by and large the most entertaining form of Poker that there is, the distinct disadvantage that it creates is in how easily you can predict your opponents' moves, based on how you have been watching them play for the last ten years.

Similarly, unless you play a random game everytime, or slowplay/bluff with the absolute best frequency, your moves are probably also quite predictable. What's more is that if you play loose with a mediocre hand, it will be noted. If you bluff and are caught, it will be noted. What if you found inexpensive opportunities to show the table your loose play and bluffing on purpose to mislead them in how they interpret your playing style?

Practice inexpensive advertising to create false impressions of your playing style.

For the purposes of this discussion, we'll define advertising as the act of creating a false impression of your playing style for the other players to see. It was obviously not the home game crowd that invented this one. It has more of the feel of the cardroom crowd, who see so many new faces every time they play. To purposely try to deceive the regulars at your table as to your style of play will not be easy. However, if you can play dumb enough or relay the idea that you have recently decided to adjust your style, you can make effective use of advertising.

We will concentrate on two advertising plays: the loose play and the bluff.

In this example, you are dealt a hand that is above average for the game, but not a likely winner. It is plain as day that nobody has anything to brag about. Even if there is one player who may have a strong hand, you remain in the game anyway. You open betting rounds if you assume that nobody will re-raise. Otherwise, you simply check, or call the betting rounds as they go by. If there is not alot of action, then it will not cost much, but you will be showing enough enthusiasm as to indicate you are holding something. If the play remains inexpensive, you play your hand to showdown. Hopefully by this point, it's just you and one other player who has the winning hand. You throw your hand down and lose a bit of your money as your opponent scoops the pot.

Just what on earth did you accomplish here? At first glance, a bad play. And with any luck, every player that saw your hand at showdown will agree that it was a bad play. In fact, the whole point of playing this hand to showdown, even though it could not win and you were not betting strong enough to consider it a bluff, was for the players at the table to believe that you just committed a bad play. Through advertising, you have created a false impression of your playing style. You will now appear to be a player who is more loose, especially if you can follow up the play with talk about how you thought you had a chance. Advertising can cost any sum of money, but you have minimized your investment into this false impression by ensuring minimal action and loss.

The best part of all is that you may just as soon have won, in which case you get the pot. Sure, it was not a big pot, but this isn't important, as a better hand or smarter play should by all rights have taken it. So, by pure luck and an inadvertent bluff, you win the pot. Otherwise, the worst case scenario is that you have advertised inexpensively.

The way in which such an investment and purposely bad play pays dividends is when you duplicate the exact same moves later on with a monster of a hand. When dealt this monster later on in the night, you spend the first few betting rounds doing similar moves: checking (only if you assume somebody else will open) and calling, but not raising or re-raising. If it's assumed that you are too loose a player, your chances for the family pot will be taken less seriously. Then, on the last one or two betting rounds, you come out betting strong. If players still question your ability based on previous advertising, even better. Let them stay in for an even bigger pot for you.

This example begs the question: how can one single variance play (the fancy-dan term for advertising) affect players' opinions over the course of numerous hands? This is probably what discourages most people from it. I suppose it's hard to demonstrate the full worth of advertising using so basic an example as the one above. The point of players advertising is that through minimal expense, they allow the table to see their 'bad plays' on more than one occasion. While there will be some scenarios like the one above that are planned and orchestrated, opportunities to advertise for a low price may come up at rare moments to be seized upon. A variation on this play may involve staying in for a couple of betting rounds, and then folding. Upon folding, you expose your cards to the table (which, although ethically wrong, is not usually outlawed) who see the crap cards you were staying in on. This creates the false impression of what your requirements are to stay in a pot. If exposing your folded cards is so frowned upon, then just tell everybody what you had stayed in on.

A false bluff, as opposed to one where you are honestly trying to scare everybody out of the game, can also be used as advertising. In our discussion of tells, we talked about how 'false tells' can be exhibited using advertising. If you can make an inexpensive 'bluff', exhibiting certain tells like forehead scratching or bottom lip-biting, then come showdown, the table will see that you were bluffing. Later on, when you are dealt a monster, you bet and raise again, while exhibiting the exact same tells. The beauty of it is that as players feel they've tagged onto your bluff tells, you show them your monster and collect the pot.

In both examples of advertising, you make an inexpensive investment for future dividends. In both examples, you were dealt bad cards. Rather than play the hand tight or fold outright, you not only stay in the game, but you make sure that everybody at the table saw what you stayed in with. This sets the precedent that you either are too loose a player or that you exhibit certain tells when bluffing. Later on in the night, your time comes up and you are dealt a monster hand. This time, you have a hand worth playing legitimately. You duplicate the moves made previously while advertising in order to lure players in. They still believe that either you are too loose, or that the tells you exhibit indicate that you are bluffing. More players stay in the game, because they don't take your presence as seriously. When more players stay in the game, the pot increases in size. That pot is the one to win with your monster hand.

Realistically, you will only pull in one or two big pots through a previous variance play. However, a number of variance plays peppered over the course of the night will offer the chance to pull a number of big pots most every time you are dealt a monster. Kept inexpensive, advertising is a cheap way of further confusing players' perception of your style. The more confused they are, the less they can read your hands.

The key is to think of advertising as anything visible that you pull throughout the night to deceive your opponent's perception of your playing style.

My Story: Cheating Exposed (Cont.)

Sorry I had to end my story the other time, I had to go to this meeting. Anyway, let me continue.

So there we were playing still and the two guys who kept winning got up and it was just six of us now. All of us were short stacked except for the other two. I was wondering if they were simply out tonight and everyone around them was on a bad beat or if they were just cheating. That was the question I badly wanted to be answered. I was thinking that they would come back so my friend and I went out for a smoke- I wanted to know if he was thinking what I was thinking.

Just before we went outside, my friend said that the two guys were cheating- I thought so. The guy we came with is good friends with the guy having the game and also happened to be one of the guys who were cheating. I thought about saying something to him but did not since we were not holding to any proof- just the fact that we were losing all our money and i was sure they would have just said we were just mad since we were losing our money.

We went back and tried to come out of something that would prove they were cheating. It was my deal and I stayed in and won that one. The next deal was one of the guys we thought was cheating. So it came around to him and he dealt. I got Ace 2 suited so I called. The guy who kept winning called and so did about three others. The flop came and it was 3,4,6 all I needed was a 5 for a straight so I bet big to get the others to fold and they did well- all but you know who.

The next card was big so I bet big again and he called. So now I was thinking what the heck does this guy have to be calling me. Well, the river comes and it’s a 5 so I go all in and he calls me so I turn mine up with a straight and the dealer starts pushing the chips to the other guy I said I win! He did not show his hand and the dealer said without thinking “he has a 7 for a higher straight” I said, how did you know that without seeing his hand?” So the other guy turned his hand and he had a 7. So the whole time he was calling me with nothing until 4th street. The dealer said he showed them, that was he knew what he had. Everyone else at the table said he never showed them.

No matter. The point I am trying to arrive at is that they were cheating no matter how they put it. We eventually got our money back and never went there again. So when you are at a person’s house you do not really know, always keep an eye out and OBSERVE- this is one of the fundamental of playing live or Online Poker. I am not saying everyone is a cheater, but everyone has tendencies to do that expecially if you are not familiar with their territories. No matter how many Poker Reviews you read but do not observe, it will all be put to nothing no matter the kind of place or Poker Room you are playing. Understood? Gotta run.

My Story: Cheating Exposed

Let me continue my Poker story or rather my Poker history. I think I have mentioned that I have since been playing live and Online Poker and that I have sent my siblings to school and bought my dream houses with the money I have earned just working the tables and platforms. So what story do I share now?

Well, let me tell you that I hate cheaters. Let me tell you this story. It was Poker night so we met at this bar where we normally played. When I arrive at the bar, they told me that there was a change of venue and that we were going to play at someone else’s house instead. I didn’t know the owner of the house but decided to go with the flow instead. My friends said that they had played with him so I guess there’s really nothing to worry about.

I was not getting good cards while playing so I folded a lot and observed others and see how they were playing. There was not a set dealer we all took turns dealing. After about three or four rounds, I noticed that this single person won every time the other person dealt. I started to keep an eye on this person even though at the cost of losing. I just do not like being cheated.

I did not have very goodcards agin the next time around so I just folded and watched the dealer. I was actually in the blind of watching him since I did not know the first thing about looking for mechanics at a table. During that time I had only been playing Poker for only about three months. The same guy won again so I took a break and went to a different table to play for a bit. I won my money back there and a chair came open at the table I was at beforee so I went back. I was thinking that maybe there is no cheating after all, maybe it was just my ego saying that because I was already losing.

After four more turns around the table, I was already winning a good bit so I thought for sure it was my ego getting in the way of a good Poker game. Well it was rather the same deal and my friend for about twenty years now and we were in a hand with the same guy that seemed to be winning when the other guy deals. Now my friend is already a great Poker player- like me, ahem- and he does not stay in a hand too often if he thinks there is even a remote chance of him losing. I folded pre flop and my friend raised. So I was like I better get out of this hand. Well anyway my friend went all in after the flop and when they turned them up my friend had 4 of a kind of 9’s and the other guy had a pair of tens in the pocket and the 9’s on the board. Well if you play Poker and you have 4 of kind it is not likely you will lose to a higher 4 of a kind. Well the impossible happened, the next two cards were 10’s. Because of that I said to my friend that I think it’s time to go but my friend wanted to stay and play some more so we stayed and played for about three hours more…..

(Cheating exposed, next post)

Is poker a sport?



We all know that Poker is a game of chance and skill but can it really be considered as a sport? Moreover, is gambling a kind of sport? Well, whether or not Poker is a sport is fairly debatable isn’t it ? Let us hear the different agument presented by a british guy if playing Pokercan be considered as a valid sport or not.

I have stumbled across many dictionary type definitions of sport, some of which I could have used because they would clearly define Poker as a sport, however the following is from our good friends at the Oxford English Dictionary, not only are Oxford probably the most reputable but their definition highlights the problem people have with thinking of Poker as a sport:

An activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others.

The competition we have no problem with here, Poker is of course a competitive game against other people instead of the house. The skill element I hope nobody disagrees with because if you are a Poker player and you don’t accept the skill element involved then you probably are a very weak player and are welcome to my home game any time.

The clear difference between Poker and other commonly agreed upon sports is the physical aspect, most impartial observers employ a no sweat, no sport system of judging whether something is a sport or not. Poker is far from a physical game, however anyone who has participated in a live tournament that spans several days will tell you differently. Those things are physically exhausting and to be able to play your best game after days of Poker with little or no sleep is nothing short of actual physical ability. But using tournament poker as an advocate for the Poker is a sport argument, that would mean discounting cash games and internet tournaments because of the fact they can be relatively short pursuits.

Tournament Poker may be a test of endurance, but the dynamics of a single hand can hardly be considered anything but a mental activity. Doyle Brunson could hardly be considered an athlete, a senior citizen and rather on the portly side, yet he is still to this day one of the best players in the world.

Based on the arguments presented by Barry Carter, I sadly conclude that Poker cannot be considered a sport if we are going to follow the technical definition of the word sport. Sports though is not all about physical exertion. Just think about other endeavors which are considered sports even in the absence of physical exertion. Barry Carter mentioned darts and snooker. Chess, apparently, does not require any physical toughness since chess players just rely on the sharpness of their minds. So why is chess included in sporting events even though it is not about physical exertion? Hmmm. Want to share your thoughts about this one before I share mine?

By the way there are some comprehensive Poker Reviews about this topic as well as the best Poker Rooms in this site.

Friday, June 6, 2008

Overconfidence can kill



This is not a golden rule but it is related to most of the golden rules i have posted. This is a again fairly common sense and self discipline. If you do not have these two traits, no matter how often you read Poker Reviews, it will be completely useless. Read on.

Control of wagers is the easiest way to summarize what most live or Poker players should instill within themselves, especially when they reach a point to which they get that unlikely feeling of wanting to win it all. This usually occurs when a person would lose some amount all from constant losing on dealt hands. While there are the professional who know when to quit, there are the others who are simply agog over the whole thing and would continue to play until they are able to win back their lost wagers.

This is the typical picture for people who are not regular gamblers. Once they have tasted the sweetness of winning, they find themselves gaining confidence to which they would not care if they start losing. Once they do, the notion that they can still continue to play and try to win back their earnings becomes their downfall since chances are they would lose more than what they actually won.

For the seasoned Poker players, they know when to stop and take a breather. There are winning streaks in Poker but there are losing ones as well. This is what separates the pros from the amateurs. They know how to read hands and imply an analytic approach towards the game.

Poker may be analytical but is also a fun game if people would know how to play it in the way that it should be. Based on the exposure that World Poker Tours have been providing, the techniques of the game have been made available through modern day viewing and the strategies that are being used by the professional Poker players. This alone is a bonus in terms of being able to implement their own ways and devising new strategies in enjoying the game and becoming competitive as well.

It is true that for the average Poker player, the game will become complicated at first. The number of possibilities, the wagers, the psychological aspect and the approach to be used is all factors that not so seasoned players will have to deal with at first. These are not easy to handle. Brewing them up into one single formula is easier said than done. But in reality, they offer more than that. It is difficult to reach the level to which they would be comfortable playing Poker if they do not have the proper mind set. This is one reason why people new to the game just don’t know how to treat the game and take control of their urge for it.

After a hot stripping, now here comes the sixth golden rule

Reading my previous posts will give you a conclusion that every Poker strategy tip- no matter where Poker Review sites you get it- is somehow interlinked with every other Poker strategy tip.

The following one is no exception in regards to the type of game that you play. It involves the touchy subject of bluffing. A player who bluffs too much is one who is playing too loosely. He will never be raised with anything less than a strong hand. He will never be called with anything less than a mediocre hand. And, he will never be taken to task with a poor hand and a bluff. A player who bluffs too little is one who is playing too tightly. Nobody will ever stay in the game if he raises. He will back out of every pot when dealt a bad hand. And every pot that he wins will be minimal in size.

Both of these players suffer from an adjustment needed in the frequency with which they bluff. If you bluff too much, everybody around you will play their hands honest, never taking your raises seriously. If you bluff too little, nobody around you will play their hands when you raise unless they are holding monsters.

Want to maximize bluffing wisely? Follow this tip.

Utilize bluffing; bluff with the best-balanced frequency to maximize its usefulness.


The first thing to acknowledge is that bluffing is an essential element of Poker. Without it, your arsenal decreases in potency. The player who sits back all night waiting for a good hand to collect a pot will lose more in most hands than he wins when his monster comes around. The fact is that most people recognize of other players whether or not they are 'bluffers'. If you've been known to bluff -successfully or not- you can already count yourself one step closer to being among the Poker-playing elite. If you can create doubt at a table when you bet, you're doing yourself all kinds of favours.

Having recognized the need to bluff at least minimally, we move on to how to bluff successfully and with the right frequency. To put to use what we've learned so far, the best bluff involves no tells. You need to ensure that when you bluff, you act and carry yourself in the same manner as you would if you were betting with a good hand.

The size of the pot is also important(See my previous posts). When you bluff, you anticipate folding at least one hand. If no hand folds, then your bluff was a failure or the hands out there are too strong. The larger the pot, the less likely a player will fold from it, as they have much more to gain from staying in the game. If the pot is smaller, then your bluff will fold more hands. In short, don't make the mistake of trying to bluff for an enormous pot...you won't stand a chance.

The amount of live players in the game is also important. Bluffing out one player is possible, two players is hard, three players is next to impossible, four players or more has a snowball's chance in hell. When you bluff, you try to scare other players out of the game by making them believe that your hand is stronger than it is. Effectively, you are pulling off a ruse...a deception. It's a whole lot easier to deceive a smaller number of players, and a monster won't back out of the pot (or even a loose player with a semi-decent hand). The stronger your opponent's hand, the more likely you will be called. If your opponent re-raises, give very serious consideration to getting out of the pot.

The type of live players in the game is equally important, and an issue already discussed. You would not bluff into a loose player who never folds. If you know that this player will call you, then you also know that a bluff would be a waste of money. Against such a player, you would be far better to not bluff at all, checking or folding a weak hand. You should be more inclined to bluff into one or two tight players. They are more prone to folding, but when a really tight player calls you, look out. He's probably holding a strong hand. If he goes further and re-raises, get the hell out. You've been had...there should be no shame in strategic folding.

The tough part about home games is that typically, there are lower stakes to keep things friendly. While this is the Poker that I much prefer, the problem that it creates is that players are often prone to call before they fold. When fifty cents is the maximum bet, most people will be inclined to stay in the game. There are two ways of handling this where it concerns small stakes games.

One, never try to bluff more than two players out of a small stakes game, and consider going at two players to even be a risky move. Even with low stakes, one player can be scared out of the game, but two will be a challenge. Two, get a feel for the table. Even though fifty cents is not a large sum of money, the feel of the table may be that because it is the maximum bet, it is enough of a scare in itself. Put another way, you are making a strong statement by using the table's maximum bet, even though the size of that bet is not alot of money. Only a table with this type of perspective will offer this kind of atmosphere. Otherwise, with stakes too low, everybody will play loosely, minimizing your room to bluff.

The frequency with which you bluff is another tricky element. There are two things you want to bear in mind. The first is how you perceive the table you're sitting at. The second is how you plan to have yourself perceived by the table.

The first is one we've already discussed. If the table is loose, bluff less. If the table is tight, bluff more. If the pot is big, be less inclined to bluff. If there are alot of live players in the game, be less inclined to bluff. If the table's higher to maximum bets are typically not enough to really scare anybody out of a hand, be less inclined to bluff. You make assessments of the players at the table as you go, and adjust the elements of your playing style accordingly. Bluffing is no different. You might even be able to plan your bluff to the number after drawing enough conclusions about the table (ie. "I will bluff one in every twelve weak hands.").

The second point about frequency is what turns the tables on you, as it were. We've spent a considerable amount of time discussing how you perceive the rest of the table. Now, imagine for a moment that you too are being evaluated and assessed. If you play with skilled players, do more than imagine...assume you are being evaluated and assessed. If you play in a regular home game, ask yourself now what your reputation is at that table. Do they think you play too tight? Too loose? More importantly for our discussion here, you want to assess how your bluffing frequency is perceived by the table. Do they think you bluff too much? Not enough or never at all?

Just as you would use your opponents' excessive or insufficient bluffing against them, so too will a skilled player use yours against you. The frequency with which you bluff makes up the image with which you are viewed. As mentioned, getting caught bluffing isn't all bad. At least now, you create the doubt every time you raise that you might be bluffing again. So, there are good rules to go by. Allow the times you are caught bluffing to 'go on your record'. When you successfully bluff and nobody paid to see it, don't show your hand to the table; you don't need to show to collect the pot. But, most importantly, find the perfect balance between not bluffing enough and bluffing too much.

It is likely that you will want to avoid bluffing more times than not. Again, all that you need is the idea planted into the heads of your opponents that yours is a playing arsenal that includes the occasional bluff. You want doubt to result from your raises. You want the perfect balance to keep your opponents on their toes.

RATED PG: CLOTHES IS THE CURRENCY

I am really addicted to playing strip Poker with my friends and boyfriend. It is actually a fun way to play Poker without the pressure of winning. Because here, as you all know, the currency Poker players are fighting for is the clothing. In this post i am going to share how to play strip Poker and show you how exciting it is.


The girl who loves to play strip Poker.



Watch how she plays, and if she is really determined to keep her clothes on



You think she is winning or losing?


I think she is losing. Boohoo!


This girl does not know how to play strip Poker



Or maybe she is just playing strip Poker with her boyfriend...


I usually play this kind of game when i am feeling bored with all the Poker games i am playing. If i am playing this with my girlfriends, of course, i have to win, but if i am playing this with my boyfriend, sometimes i have to lose for his sake.

Anyway, if you are a starter in this hot game, i got the game rules for you which i got in different Online Poker sites, specializing in honest Poker Reviews.

Materials needed: An ordinary deck of 52 playing cards.

Goal: Win regular Poker hands to keep your clothes.

GAME RULES

The dealer chooses a game (deal is passed after each game, clockwise), and deals.

The choice of games should exclude games that rely on betting to work, as Strip Poker is not a betting game. Guts, Sweep, 7 card stud, Seven Card No Peek, 3-5-7, and variants are examples of betting games best avoided in a hand of Strip Poker. Two or None, Five Card Draw, Low Ball and similar one or no draw games are good Strip Poker games.

In it's simplest form, either the player with the lowest hand must remove one article of clothing, or all players except the highest hand must remove an article of clothing (depending on how fast your group of players wants the game to progress).

In this form, the game is played until only one player has clothes left (and is therefore the winner or looser as the case may be). Players who have lost all their clothes generally are required to remain nude until the game has finished, leaving only one winner.

As an optional rule, to insure fairness, have all players begin with the same number of articles. Five is generally a good number, counting pairs of shoes, or socks as one article.

TRUTH OR DARE STRIP Poker.

In this fun variant, losing all of one's clothes doesn't mean you can't keep participating in the game. This is a game which doesn't necessarily have a set winner, as play can continue even after everyone has lost all of their clothing.

Once a person has lost all clothing, they continue playing their hands as normal. Whenever a totally nude player is required to lose an article of clothing, they instead subject themselves to a Truth or a Dare, administered by the player with the highest hand that round.

Traditionally, in Truth or Dare, the person performing the Dare, or answering the Truth gets to choose between Truth or Dare. You'll likely find a lot of players sticking to Truth if you go about it that way, though. One solution to this is not allowing players to choose the same option more than twice in a row (usually, but not always resulting in a truth-truth-dare-truth-truth-dare pattern) Another option is to shift the choice to the person doing the asking or daring (the winner of the hand).

Truth: A person owing a truth is asked a question by the winner of the hand, and is expected to answer truthfully. These questions are usually sexual in nature, but don't have to be, they are sometimes embarrassing, but in the spirit of the game, the loser should try to answer as truthfully (if not as completely) as possible.

Dare: As Truths, the winner administers these to whoever has no clothes, and is required by the game to remove something. Instead of a question, the player is asked (dared) to perform some action.

There may be times when a player will refuse to answer a question, or do a Dare (spoil-sports!). For these situations, have an alternate punishment for failing to live up to the Dare. If you and your friends are drinking, a shot of tequila can serve as punishment, and might loosen up that prudish player! If not, think of something all players agree on before hand.

Other possible punishments:
Jumping Jacks - Faced with a consequence of doing this nude in front of everyone may make the dare seem more appealing.
Frosty - The uncooperative player's underwear goes in the freezer for a while, and they have to wear them for a round after they come out.

It is very important that all players understand and agree to all the rules of Strip Poker before play begins. Anyone not willing to follow through on rules established before the game began should not be playing! Nobody likes a spoil-sport, and people should not be forced or pressured into doing something they don't want to do. Avoid these problems by making everything clear from the get-go. If someone does chicken out, let them, and just don't invite that person to play in your next game.

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Tired of Waiting? Here's the 5th Golden Poker Rule



Today, we are going to discuss tells. If you want a comprehensive analysis about tells, then i suggest you visit this honest and reliable Poker Review site which Poker experts frequent.

If you have read my previous posts, you will notice that i have touched on the subject of tells. If only it will not information overload, i would have include tells in our discussion on the observation of other players. When you observe other players in action in order to discern consistent playing style and individual characteristics, one very important feature that you are looking for are tells.

I am sure you know what a tell is, but i am just not sure whether or not you know the term. Tell is short for 'telegraph', where a player telegraphs his or her hand to the rest of the table through physical tendency. Do you light up a smoke as soon as you see your monster of a hand? Does your holding hand shake involuntarily when you're bluffing? Do you scratch your ass when you're holding nothing good? These are tells. These are your consistent responses to specific hands through 'unconscious' physical action.

Be aware of tells in yourself; be aware of tells in others.

The order in which these two points are expressed is no accident. I have always been of the opinion that the first place to go to learn about tells is not your fellow player at the table, but rather yourself. Poker lore dictates that if you've never before given thought to tells, then you're probably full of them. Any good book on interview skills warns you against such physical slights. The first thing you have to do is be aware of them.

There is clearly only one exercise in observing and preventing this kind of activity. Aside from your friends filling you in on your own tells, the only way to track them is to pay attention to them. In getting you started, I'll run you through my own experience with tell-finding.

First, I bite my nails. This is a habit I've never even tried to stop; I will always bite my nails. As far as I can tell, I bite them most when I'm anxious or bored. At the Poker table, I consciously stop myself whenever the urge strikes me to go to town on my fingertips.

Second, I used to smoke cigarettes regularly; now, I smoke casually, which is probably worse. The urge to light up a cigarette is triggered by different things in different people. As a casual smoker, I tend to light up again when I'm anxious or bored. At the Poker table, I consciously time my cigarettes at approximately one hour between them; with that kind of consistent frequency, it gives nothing away of my game.

Third, when looking at my hand for the first time in a game, I sometimes pick up the cards, look at them, and hold onto them; other times, I pick them up, look at them, and drop them right to the table. Unlike a nervous habit like nail-biting or cigarette-smoking, it is hard to target what triggers card-holding versus cards-down. Quite frankly, I've just as soon decided that it does not matter. In games with two hole cards, I have trained myself to look at them once and put them down every time. In games with more than two hole cards (except for Stud), I have trained myself to keep the cards in my hand throughout my whole tenure in the game every time.

What we have here is an intraspection into my own unconscious physical tendencies, slights, habits, and twitches at the Poker table. Each one of them is triggered by either one situation or another. There is nothing to suggest that one twitch means I have a good hand, and the other means I am bluffing. In fact, it is quite possible that none of these tendencies give anything away of my actual hand. The point is that it does not matter.

These are unconscious physical tendencies that should be reigned into consistent action regardless of the hand I am holding. Now, I don't bite my nails at the Poker table. Now, I smoke cigarettes in timed intervals. Now, I always hold my cards in some games, and never hold my cards in others. There is another school of thought that talks of purposely using assumed tells to mislead players as to your true hand. Such a tactic might involve biting your nails while playing a purposely ill-played and inexpensive bluff to showdown, so that the table thinks you bite your nails when you bluff. Advertising, as it is called to mislead players this way, is a subject that will be discussed at length later.

The next step in your quest to use tell-smarts at the Poker table is obviously to switch taking note from yourself to taking note of others. The problems with this are obvious. How are you supposed to keep staring at people -even at the Poker table- without making some people angry? What classifies as a tell as opposed to a player's once-in-awhile twitch? How do you keep an eye on everybody at the table? Who do you watch?

These are all valid questions. If Poker was played for nothing but fun like cribbage, then ideally, we would all just sit around and play our hands honest. But when there's money on the line and deception is an important part of the game, you need to be aware of tells in other players, and you need tact in noticing them for later reference.

There are a number of ways of going about this. Here's one. From hand to hand, take note of the players involved in the action. There should only be two or three of them in any given hand, but the players who are involved in betting are players obviously holding a strong hand or else, bluffing. Logically, these are also the players most likely to play their hand until showdown, at which point you will be able to see what they were holding, even if you'd previously folded out of the hand. While looking for tells, you are able to associate a potential tell with that player's hand at showdown (either as a bluff or a legitimately strong hand). Because only a few players are ever involved in any real action, there are not too many for you to have to watch.

So, you know what few people you need to watch from hand to hand. You also know what to look for at showdown, be it a bluff or a strong hand. But, what are you specifically looking for in these players? This is the part that makes abstract and vague any discussion on tells. It is hard to say exactly what to look for. A tell is involuntary, so it could be as minute as bottom-lip-biting or as obvious as a sweaty forehead or shaky hand. It could be anything in-between, if nails are bitten, how a cigarette is smoked, if cards are held sometimes and put down others. A tell could be anything...body language of any kind.

If you think you've spotted a tell, take note of what that player has at showdown, which costs you no money, as we've discussed. If you think you've made a connection, put it to the test the next time that player is involved in any action. The rare repeat of tells connected to a hand of specific strength just might be the winner you are looking for. Be forewarned however that the skilled poker player has no to few tells. True enough though, anybody can slip up and forget to watch themselves.

This brings up the point of one-time tells. Even trickier than repeat tells is the possibility that a player can do something once (and if a skilled player, probably only once) that helps identify that player's hand. A widening smile on any player's face would tend to suggest a bluff in a skilled player or a strong hand in an unskilled player. A long pause from any player would suggest mixed feelings towards one's hand, or hesitation to play out a mediocre hand. Any player who is overanxious is showing far too much interest, and is likely bluffing or holding a monster.

There is even an off-chance that your self-search of tells will help identify possible tells in others. Once you have corrected them in yourself, and once you have begun to seek them out and use them against others, you are making use of the home game's most underrated weapon in card-reading, player-reading, and situation-reading.

It is really important that you know how to read tells, it is one of the most important strategies that will make you win. Of course, reading tells requires a lot of psychological thinking. You cannot let other players that you are such deceitful ass who psychoanalyze them. You have to be careful so your ploy won't be busted.

Next golden rule on my next post.

Vanity and Poker: Allow me to share my poker history

Don't you just love Poker? Me and my friends including my boyfriend all love to either live Poker or Online Poker. We think that playing Poker is really fun and at the same time it lets earn big big money. But of course, playing Poker will only be fun if you know how to play it.

I remember the time when i was just starting to play Poker. I was not a fast learner but i have the patience to learn the game. In fact, i was even more willing to learn how to play Poker than go to school and learn about boring subjects that i cannot apply to real life situations. But maybe if i really have the means and motivation to continue studying then maybe i just opted to study. But the thing is my family do not have the money so i ended up playing Poker. And choosing to play Poker than continue to study for college is never a wrong decision for me.

By playing Poker, i was able to send my siblings to reputable schools and gave them the life that i never got to experience. Yes, i am playing Poker for a living. Unlike other Poker players who are too ashamed to admit that this is their job because "educated and successful" people might think that they are good for nothing losers who just resorted to gambling as a mean to survive, i, on the other hand, is not ashamed. Playing Poker has given me the chance to live again- compared to my old job in which i do not really earn that much- and experience the things i never got to experience. Poker lets me buy the things i want to buy without having seconds because my family might starve if i buy this or not. Because i have been playing Poker for a long long time and is considered to be one of the best players by my friends and acquaintances, i have already bought myself 2 houses and some luxury cars. And yes, you are reading that right.

It is not easy to reach or to get what i have right now. You have to study seriously how it is to learn this game. Studying means reading, observing, and thinking. Those who are interested about Poker have to read Poker Reviews so you will know which sites offer safe Poker Rooms and which sites offer the best sites for Online Poker.

Keep in mind though that live Poker and Online Poker are two different things. For starters, i would suggest that they start via playing online first. There are sites their that offer various beginner's games that are for free. Just be careful in entering and downloading softwares because more often than not viruses or spywares are attached than either make your computer crash or steal some very important information like your credit card numbers which can put your security at risk.

I am suggesting that you go to this Poker Review site because it is where i get daily news and tips to improve gaming experience. This Poker Review site also offers Poker Rooms for beginners.

So there, i need to run now since my friends are here and we are going to play Pokerrrrr babeeee. See ya!

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

And the 4th poker golden rule is... read on stupid



It is a complete exercise of futility if you stick to plain Poker strategies and do not adapt your ways to the ways of your opponents in the Poker table. This rule is very similar to the tips you have to follow in choosing a Poker Room. If you think Poker Reviews say that you should go to this certain Poker Room but your instincts tell you otherwise. Then better follow your instinct or be sorry for the rest of your life.

You could be told how frequently to call, to raise, to bluff, to fold, to advertise, but these guidelines are meaningless when not tempered by the influence of the playing style of your opponents at the table. Would you try to bluff out a player who never folds? Would you try to sandbag a table full of players who only check or call, but never bet or raise? No, you would modify your style accordingly.

The fourth golden rule is just common sense: Know the players at the table; adjust your playing style accordingly.

In my previous post, I spoke of the player who not only never folded, but rarely let a bet leave him without a re-raise. Let's assume that I'm the kind of guy who bluffs with a certain frequency. Playing heads up against this player, how would I adjust that frequency to compensate for my opponent's style? A bluff is only used to make a player fold immediately, or to suggest enough strength that the player will fold on a later round. So, if I'm playing against a player who NEVER folds, then even one attempt to bluff is a waste of money.

Therefore, if the frequency with which I bluff was written in stone instead of flexible, I would lose money against this type of player. Knowing what I know of his style, I'm now smart to the fact that he will not fold. Further, attempts to bluff would be wastes of money. Therefore, I won't even try to bluff, and this will save me the money that I would have lost if I didn't adjust my game plan according to what I know of my opponent.

Sandbagging -having a strong hand, but not opening a betting round, waiting for somebody else to open it, and then raising the bet when it gets back to me- has one criterion where it concerns the other players at the table. If I do not think that one single player at the table will open the betting round, and that everybody checks, then the strategy of sandbagging would be an indirect waste of money. It would allow every player at the table to stay in the game for free, since nobody bet. And considering my strong hand, it would mean less money in the pot that I intend to win.

As noted, it is an indirect loss to not maximize the amount of money in the pots that you win. Playing at this table, how would I adjust the frequency with which I sandbag? A failed sandbag is one where nobody opens the betting round that I "should have" opened, and the number of failed sandbags is certain to increase at a table where everybody checks and call, but nobody bets and raises. Therefore, each attempt to sandbag would mean allowing players with poor hands to remain in the game for free (also allowing them the opportunity to put together a better hand if there are more cards to come) as well as reducing the amount of money that could have accumulated in the pot had I won.

Therefore, I won't even try, or may simply reduce my attempts, to sandbag, and this will save me the indirect loss of money that results from failed sandbagging. Again, my game plan adjusted according to what I know of my opponents at the table.

Home games offer the irreplaceable benefit of seeing the same mugs at the table on a bi-weekly, or even weekly basis. Whereas figuring out a stranger requires you to analyze and evaluate from scratch, playing with the same people allows you to use your knowledge of how they typically act in given situations. Taken a step further, it even allows you to use your knowledge of what they think you are doing based on the way they think you typically act in given situations.

Broadly speaking, there are three categories of Poker players: tight players, loose players, and players who are neither consistently. Tight players play a more conservative game where the dispensing of money is concerned. They will fold before they call, they will call before they raise, they will play 'honest' before they bluff. Loose players play a more liberal game. They will call before they fold, they will raise before they call, they will bluff before they play 'honest'.

A solid Poker player falls into neither of these two generic categories, falling rather into neither. The player who is neither loose nor tight (or enough of each to evade this classification) is the hardest to nail down. Your game plan needs to reflect this distinction. A bluff is a play more sound against a tight player than a loose one. A slowplay or downright sandbagging is a play more sound against a loose player than a tight one.

The tight-versus-loose player analysis is an excellent, but general one. It will tell you in very general terms how a player will react to a given situation. If it is a situation involving 'monetary intimidation', it will be more effective against the tight player. If it is a play involving 'monetary extraction', it will be more effective against the loose player. It, of course, is not nearly enough to rely on altogether. If the general feel of the table is tight or loose -a tight table or a loose table, as they say- then certain general playing is effective. However, specific players will be prone to specific characteristics going beyond tight and loose.

Some players sweat when they bluff (or scratch their face, or light up a smoke, or adjust themselves uncontrollably in their seat, or pretend they're not interested in the hand, or show that they are far too interested in the hand, etc.). Note this and use it to your advantage. Some players only raise when holding a certain hand at a certain point in the game. Note this as well. Some players slowplay more times than not. Some players are watching you carefully. Some players are not watching you at all. Some players take the game very seriously. Some players are having fun first and playing a serious game second. Note all of this. When you can observe with certainty that a given player has a trigger that suggests what that player is holding, it's as good as gold.

How liberal is a player with their money? Does a player reek of tells? What consistencies are in that player's game? In short, in what ways does a given player illustrate consistency? Consistent play is what you can depend on from a player, and use to your advantage. You have to know the players, and adapt your game plan.

Actually, you know what i think? This rule shouldn't be a rule at all since it is merely natural for us to adjust or adapt to the ways of others. But then again, some people are born stupid who would rather stick to the books than follow their own instincts.